• 0 Posts
  • 289 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 10th, 2024

help-circle




  • i’ve banned all the accounts i could identify as part of this scheme from lemmy.world now.

    i originally sent them a warning before i was aware of the scale of this involving a bunch of alts with different usernames. if i had known that when i sent the warning it would’ve been a ban straight away.

    they replied to my warning pretending they didn’t know about any recent vote manipulation, so they’re clearly not interested in acting in good faith going forward.



  • I’ve sent out warnings to 10 other users in the past few days about similar behavior already and also banned two users for this type of behavior. one of them appealed and is unbanned again.

    I also had this account in my list of such accounts, but I hadn’t followed up on it yet, as I figured I’d just deal with the top n users and then review it again at a later point in time.

    i’ve sent them a warning about this as well now that they’ll get banned from our instance if they continue engaging in this behavior.




  • ethical ads are virtually non-existent. when limiting ads to ethical ads it’s unlikely you’re getting even remotely close to bringing in the necessary funds.

    people promoting ads are typically those who expect others to suffer while they themselves are using ad blockers. there are some people who honestly turn off ad blockers, but i wouldn’t recommend anyone to do that for any site, as i don’t consider the majority of ads ethical and it’s also often used as a malware/phishing/scam distribution mechanism.

    this is also a vicious cycle of more people blocking ads -> ads getting worse to offset the lost ad revenue -> more people blocking ads. this is what lead to the internet today, where the majority of the internet is basically unusable if you don’t use ublock origin or a comparable solution.





  • instance admins were indeed asked to help promote the post, but this is nothing anyone was forced to do, and this is probably something we would have done without explicitly being asked about it. i don’t see anything that would need to be disclosed here, as it is in our own interest keep lemmy development going and we did not receive or were offered anything in return for sharing this post.

    the draft for the original post was shared a few days ago in a public matrix room for instance admins, so admins had some time to consider if/how they wanted to help promoting this when it was published and maybe prepare some text for their own posts.



  • it’s around 2.5% of our monthly expenses that go to the lemmy devs. 2% of the stated minimum donation goal would be the hosting costs for lemmy.ml. with the assumption that the lemmy donation goals is met, that would mean around 0.05% of the donations to lemmy.world/fedihosting foundation are used for lemmy.ml hosting costs.

    this was already explained in a few other places in the comments here, but in the end, even if it wasn’t directly going to instance operating costs, if you pay people a salary and they then take it out of their own pockets there is no real difference, as the money would still end up in the same place.

    edit: it has since been clarified that only donations via Lemmy’s open collective account are used for lemmy.ml hosting costs. our donations towards Lemmy development are not done through open collective and therefore 0% of lemmy.world/fedihosting foundation donations are used for lemmy.ml hosting costs.

    whether this is something that makes a difference in the end is something you have to decide on your own, but this is still the addressing the frequently mentioned topic of having donations explicitly for development rather than also supporting lemmy.ml operations.





  • MrKaplan@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldHelp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    sorry about the late response, got a lot of stuff going on currently and it seemed like you got useful replies here already anyway when i checked before.

    we currently have a rule in place that blocks traffic with too high of a threat score. this rule was implemented before i joined, i’ll have to check with the team about the original reason for this and if we want to relax this.

    at least the error message should be improved if we can do that, i think that’s just returning a static message currently.