June is Pride Month! Do you feel you’re on this scale? Or more of a mix of different ones?

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    3-5 70% of the time, some days i can’t be bothered to dress up and just wear a bra with T-shirt and men’s gym shorts though

  • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think this ought to include two dimensions (at least), one spectrum of gender and another of presentation. So woman to man on one, and feminine to masculine on another. The middle on the existing chart gets complicated because it wants to order butch women on the femme=woman side and feminine men on the masc=man side and they don’t quite line up. If I could draw, I’d make a chart like:

    Barbie Tig Notaro
    Dan Levy GI Joe

    (celebs just examples that came to mind, not necessarily the epitome of this structure lol)

    • Lady Butterfly she/her@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree, it’s definitely oversimplified. I bet all of us are X number in one trait, but Y in another. Gender is so diverse it can’t be simple.

  • Sombyr@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably between a 4 and a 5. I have a running half-joke with some of my friends that I’m the only femboy who is actually a woman. Half joke because it’s rediculous but also it’s kind of how I actually feel.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    According to the diagrams, holding your arms outward is feminine, but holding them inwards at your side in order to take up less space is masculine. Sounds backwards

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m not a huge fan of this diagram because it also seems to imply that having a belly is somehow more masculine? Barbie girls can have big bellies too… Thinness isn’t and shouldn’t be a factor in feminity.

    • xav@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You mean outward is backwards and inward is (straight)forward ? Or is it the other way around ?

  • Rose Thorne(She/Her)@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, kinda flit everywhere between 2 and 6, depending on the day. I feel like I’m probably a 4 on a normal day, but I can’t ignore the times of “My gender is something beyond your, and my, comprehension.”

  • sweetgemberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Honestly I’d rock an m1a1 in a dress I could have a Kevlar underskirt to match. Let me ride to war atop my Abrams chariot dressed like a queen.

    Edit: only after posting did I realise we might be talking about the toys and not dress up.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m a trans woman. Weirdly enough I’ve never had much respect for pointlessly gendered toys. If people point blank asked me “Barbie or G.I. Joe?” I’d hesitantly answer “…um, TMNT???”

    That said, I can’t explain how I got a strange productivity boost recently when I started ordering stickers and putting them everywhere. I do need some cutesiness it seems. As long as I don’t make everything pink.

    • foxglove (she/her)@lazysoci.alM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      thanks for your contribution, but this community has a rule that only women are permitted to comment. Hope you understand! 💛

        • foxglove (she/her)@lazysoci.alM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          non-binary & trans people are welcome to decide whether they feel they belong in a women-only community, so yes - they are explicitly allowed in this community …

          • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You removed a comment by a person that said they were nonbinary and explicitly said that only women may post, do you see how that would counter the rule about nonbinary users posting?

            • foxglove (she/her)@lazysoci.alM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              They haven’t identified as non-binary, but they have explicitly identified as a cis man and as not trans … I don’t see what further discussion is necessary here or why you are raising this issue about another user.

              (As an aside, it’s not uncommon for cis men to not think much about their gender or feel indifferent towards it, especially in a society that treats being a cis man as a kind of human default and anyone else is “Other”.)

              Regardless, the trans inclusive policy is meant to allow trans people to self-determine whether they feel they belong in a women-only community, and this isn’t applicable in a case where someone explicitly identifies as a cis man.

              • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Where is that explicit identification? I’ve seen them identify as trans/non-binary in other spaces before. Their hexbear alt specifically has they/them pronouns cited: https://hexbear.net/u/sharkfucker420

                why you are raising this issue about another user

                Because I care about this space, on Blahaj of all places, being trans/non-binary inclusive?

                Edit: Also if they’ve said they aren’t trans, many non-binary people don’t consider themselves as such.