It ain’t just rich and powerful white dudes, though.

A whole lot of incels, for example, could use a wood chipper.

No individual is being blamed for anything… well, maybe a handful are…

We all suffer under the Imperial United States, but at least we get to choose our pain… Sometimes.

She’s gonna support him in every way she can, in and out of the bedroom.

I dunno. I keep remembering what my old Pebble did, and how well it did, and nothing more… And yep, I want it back.

Basically, a dumb watch, with an HR monitor, accelerometer, and could sync that data to my phone app.

Its API let me do cool things like pause/unpause my music while running, which was nice. But, it required the apps to be have an API for doing so.

Battery? The thing went an entire week between charges.

Why dump more resources into something, that you don’t need to, because there’s a very serviceable option already prepped for sale?

I was under the (mistaken) impression he stepped away when he left to work at MS.

Huh. I thought he had stepped away when he left for MS…

Well…

Don’t start something, won’t be something.

“Liberate”… hehe

Another good reason Poettering left the project. This was a hill he wanted to die on… glibc only.

Pretty sure our government is generally unconcerned with adherence to the law.

Its only illegal if the state decides to lay charges.

The law is clear, we just have a POTUS who doesnt care what the law says, a congress refusing to act as a check on the executive branch, and the courts are mostly captured by Trump.

If only he did this before his vote…

“Federal facilities”, as in all buildings and area around the campus that is the “Broadview ICE facility”. And, anywhere else they feel it needs to be. That’s not “the exact opposite”. And, regardless of the “why”, prayer, itself, was banned.

Again, I edited it, per your request. I’d suggest editing your rules to state link titles must match titles, verbatim, since that’s what you asked me to do, even though the title I used was in concordance with the posted rule.

Which, it added context, and was more descriptive. It was not the “exact opposite”, because rest assured, this will happen everywhere else prayer becomes “problematic” for optics in this administration.

I’ve edited, but rules say title must faily describe article, which it did already.

I suggest updating the rules to match what you said here.

You may be right…

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1f/8c/d6/1f8cd6d38c1e271bda0b390252b723f7.jpg

I guess it was the camouflage + tool that made me think otherwise, but I could be wrong there.

I do not think this is a US soldier. The shovel, in particular leads me to think this is a Brit.

Based on your excerpt, it appears the Trump administration has banned prayer inside of, and nearby, federal facilities, just like the title says.

What is misleading?