taco

Totally agree. I started just testing it out, but it’s my daily driver at this point.

I can see no fault in this logic.

The definition of obscenity necessitates a lack of “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”

This bill won’t ban porn, it’ll just make it all require a plot.

“The facts speak for themselves, and they reek of human trafficking,” [DHS spokesperson Tricia] McLaughlin said in the statement, adding that "the media’s sympathetic narrative about this criminal illegal gang member has completely fallen apart.

The facts do speak for themselves, such as him not being a criminal until/unless he’s found guilty at his trial, and his not having had a trial.

We straight up lost the War on Terror™️.

Catholics have a reputation. trump was a recuring theme in the Epstein files. Everything they say is a projected admission + they’re constantly accusing trans folks of being pedos.

I’m not saying supporting maga is supporting systematic pedophilia, but I am saying the facts strongly imply it.

I’m using the theme, so thank you.

Is there something about PRRS that makes pork extra tasty or something? Shutting down devastating viruses seems like a reasonable application.

Why are those three assholes getting a pass?

I believe the “those three voted for the bill” part of the comment to which you’re replying answers that. That bill was the one proposed to block the tariffs.

yet they still enable him to do it. If anything, they should be shamed more.

How so?

If nobody’s neutral, everybody’s neutral.

I don’t believe for an instant that anybody’s ever sincerely thought he was joking. Anyone saying this is not conversing in good faith, but I doubt that sort of thing surprises anyone reading comments on fediverse posts.

At least his certainty in blaming environmental factors rules out eugenics as the solution…or at least it would if he were vaguely aware of the concept of logical consistency.

It’s common in other formal contexts too, such as academic research.

It can’t be just me, but RFK saying objectively wrong things related to health doesn’t strike me as newsworthy at this point.

On one hand, I understand that reporting the truth is important to ensure it’s out there and people paying attention are aware. On the other, I feel like it gives an air of legitimacy, making it seem more like a debate instead of what it is: a loud idiot with a powerful friend spouting nonsense while failing at a job for which he’s unqualified.

Would definitely be a good time to rekindle his push to go to Mars.

This administration sure claims to fuck up a lot.

I was more shocked when I realized it’s only Wednesday.

…Florida law is only relevant within Florida and, to a limited extent, the United States.

And even then only to the extent those with the power to do so choose to enforce it. It might matter if you or I break the law; it will not matter in any meaningful way if Meta does.

That’s gotta be rough to hear to someone that spends so much time in a room with trump.

Hartman admits that nearly half of his business comes from selling honey to the federal government…

You probably shouldn’t be so supportive of cutting government spending if you’re the one they’re spending on. They’re not exactly going to cut down on their buddies’ contracts first.

And, if they did, it probably wouldn’t be dark anymore.