Please explain. So far i couldn’t get a grip on the logic of people laughing about a killing

Wait… “you hurt my feelings… so, because of your hate speech i am glad you were offed”

is this normalized?!

True, although the data has all to do with the COVID-19 era.

Quite sad that at some point he mentions that according to the Japanese data (which shows that detrimental health effects appear long after mRNA vaccination) that he probably has a shorter life expectancy himself. He already has health issues which appeared after each of his (i believe 2) covid-mrna-injections. He does not share his own issues on that channel often.

Hi, thanks for replying.

i ended up using “Fine floor repair compound” or “cement-based skim coat”, which is a fine-grain, cement-based floor repair paste for filling small holes and surface imperfections before finishing. (as per ChatGPT recommendations )

it was easy to apply and smear out.

i’m planning to sand it with a ‘numatic woodboy’, tomorrow. (As per Epoxy Concrete coating instruction)

i think this passage explains why Jesus took on human form:

Hebrews 2:16-18 (kjv)

16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

18 For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.

Or, in a more amplified way:

Hebrews 2:16-18 (amplified Bible)

16 For, as we all know, He (Christ) does not take hold of [the fallen] angels [to give them a helping hand], but He does take hold of [the fallen] descendants of Abraham [extending to them His hand of deliverance].

17 Therefore, it was essential that He had to be made like His brothers (mankind) in every respect, so that He might [by experience] become a merciful and faithful High Priest in things related to God, to make atonement (propitiation) for the people’s sins [thereby wiping away the sin, satisfying divine justice, and providing a way of reconciliation between God and mankind].

18 Because He Himself [in His humanity] has suffered in being tempted, He is able to help and provide immediate assistance to those who are being tempted and exposed to suffering.

like war, natural disasters and provoty in Africa.

Old testament says:

2 Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

e.g. if a country has witchcraft being part of culture, then God says repent. And if they repent…

i’m not sure what point you’re trying to make

Seeing as a muslim you’re making fun of Jesus, you might want to know what Jesus actually teaches

Matthew 5:43-48

• 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
• 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
• 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
• 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that?
• 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that?
• 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

i agree it’s not done and dusted.

But it’s less pseudoscience as the “GEET reactor” which seemingly has some similar principles operating in it. However, that was by a few people who didn’t have the physics insight/skills to properly analyze what they’d sometimes seen. This “thunderstorm generator” has some proper engineers in various places working at it.

i googled geet vs thunderstorm and actually came across this post. Not really reassuring :/

But converting isn’t the same as what you’re suggesting

It says the frontier models weren’t changed though… Do you think this introduction ending is incorrect?

Together, our findings demonstrate that frontier models now possess capabili ties for basic in-context scheming, making the potential of AI agents to engage in scheming behavior a concrete rather than theoretical concern.

Too bad that in v0.19.6 and 0.19.7 the thumbnails for many new posts will be blank

[Bug]: Images not being rendered properly after 0.19.6 upgrade #5196

i think v1.0 is there because “Ondsel” is stopping and donated things to FreeCad

https://ondsel.com/blog/goodbye/#why-ondsel-is-closing-down

(and they emailed a lot of admins asking them to ban me!)

wow…

i wonder if they recognize this behaviour, caught after the USA election results came out (viewers discretion adviced) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxZix3EL1Ms&list=PL2DkrnovXSRNHHp1I6KLwsDCHVNZ-lEbl&index=1

i agree on being charitable. That’s the only mindset which overcomes the downward spiral of society giving up on society.

What is “ND expressions”? (im not being funny or something)

imo, it’s more stupid that there’s no mainstream news coverage about this ruling against FDA. i haven’t found a single site reporting about it. you?

Must be because of what i posted.

instead of the article being scrutenized (and educating people on how to detect pseudoscience) the post got removed.

At least i got a nice reply showing what was someone’s reason for doubting the scientific process of that publisher… before it got moderated.

Maybe it’s possible to use a flags of some sort, to indicate that, even though it’s a scientific publication and was peer reviewed, that this Lemmy community thinks it’s a bad piece. (but not by up/downvote as a downvote means it goes to the end of the pile, and the education effect is lost)

Like, i want to put this article under your attention, so that i get an idea of what others think about it https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282 But i’m afraid to post it, because of the possible backlash(i.e. moderation and maybe banning?)

Thanks. yes i realized the last one, and know of his work.

Looking at the “method”, it doesn’t look like rocket-science. I’d like to know, is the publication itself a fraud or not?

Thanks for the tip.

The internet page says “Potential predatory scholarly open-access journals”

So i hope at least a few read the paper and assess their method

The interview actually had much more interesting content…