Occasionally some manufacturers use some weird proprietary connection but usually both DVD drives and 3.5" disks use the same SATA connectors. Heck, even in the old IDE/PATA days you could use the same connection on either.

So yeah, the connection is the same and probably will plug and play without any configuration needed

I’ve heard that immich and other picture-organizing software can will something like this?

Also, Sonic Robo Blast 2 Kart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qlLJrv_q-Q

I have not watched this video but the description sounds like something you would benefit from

Beware of horses. I mean, a horse is a horse, of course, but who rides is important.

2014’s Thief was very good.

Maybe it’s because they were vibe-writing.

Off the top of my head I cannot remember the specifics, but there are several options during boot that you can make optional, for instance don’t wait until there’s an internet connection.

I don’t have my glasses on right now but just reading the title, sounds like you might want this

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download

So, to be clear, GitHub is not git. Git is intrinsically distributed. GitHub is basically a repository Management service.

I did some googling for about 10 seconds and afaik GitHub does not support any type of self hosting. I know you can selfhost gitlab , but I don’t see a project for either GitHub or gitlab called spokes.

Not knowing anymore than this about what you actually want to accomplish, my advice would be to just figure out how to run your own git server (without the management fluff) and do a 3-2-1 backup scheme. You could of course also create a gitlab instance with an HA set-up, plus backing that up to the cloud.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cisa-extends-funding-to-ensure-no-lapse-in-critical-cve-services/

I thought she chunked the puppy at the end…

https://github.com/hashicorp/envconsul

Empathy is like sharing an experience.

Alice is holding a stack of papers, they get a papercut and react (yelp, pull their hand back, maybe suck on the injury). Bob sees Alice’s experience and may remember when they had gotten a papercut before or just imagine what that experience is like, and will share in the same feelings (or how Bob would imagine Alice is feeling, anyway). Bob may yelp too, or fidget with their own (uninjured) finger.

I just bought some PoE hats for my rpis, and have a managed PoE switch; rumor is, this combo basically translates to rPi WoL.

(Not meaning to ignore the rest of your comment, but not in a position to respond fully)

IDK but maybe check out Client.setMaximize(v, h)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403071

This has been on my mind, I have yet to do it but the implementation seems trivial.

You can use typical luks full disk encryption with a password. Luks actually has five password slots. Passwords do not have to be actual text, they can be a file or even part of a file.

So my idea is, buy some really cheap, low profile USB flash drives and store some seemingly innocuous data like cat pictures or public domain books, IDK and it doesn’t matter what the actual data is. Use full disk encryption and set a regular password, then add a second password that is a file or part of a file that lives on the flash drives, and have it set up to look for that file on boot as an option for unlocking.

Now the disc is fully encrypted but will boot/reboot without interruption as long as the flash drive is installed. You can remove the flash drive when you’re feeling paranoid, or even better only install it when you are going to be away for a while. If you leave with the machine having the flash drive but are feeling worried, you can remote into the machine and edit / delete the file or just clear the key slot from Luks.

That’s what’s been on my mind, anyway. I think the typical suggestion/solution is to just use drop bear and remotely unlock using that, or don’t use full disk encryption and selectively encrypt your data instead (partitions or userspace encryption).

I’m not going to proofread this so I hope it makes sense

Both can go faster than light and “therefore” break through dimensional thresholds or go backwards in time; at that point actual measurement is kinda pointless. However, Flash is bound to the Speedforce (of whatever dimension/timeline/etc he’s in) and when that’s shared with any other speedsters, he becomes less capable. Sonic does not seem to share this “weakness” therefore would be considered faster.

This is the same argument for why Superman is actually faster than Flash, too. And ignores the use of chaos emeralds.

Perhaps a good time to mention I have several raspberry pis I could add to the mix.

Yeah, this legit slaps