• 35 Posts
  • 360 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年7月4日

help-circle














  • you dont have to convince people based on dry theory. revolution does not necessairily mean a momentary violent insurection that overthrows what was. a revolution can be the process in which you create the structures you wish to see in the future, in the here and now. you then convince people by showing them first hand that it works and that it benefits them.

    here is a great video on how to construct the revolution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9K6ISx8QEQ

    it has a bit of a slow start, and feels academic but its very very insightful. absolute recomendation.


  • this is the first time i hear about that “trans people are for pam people” thing.

    i know some ppl consider nombinary ppl to excluded from bi, but thats just ignorance or exclusionary bs, that is not even in line with the ethemology of the word.

    i personally simply vibe most with the pan label, because it is kinda seperate from gender, which fits my fuck gender mindest.


  • ofc its not a phobia to have preferences. my critique is towards excluding people from certain labels of gender based attraction, for things other than their gender. especially if those people are systemically opressed for their gender.

    crazy example now, but sometimes that helps seeing things in a new light:

    if i say that im not into old people because i am a lesbian, then thats kinda messed up, because it implies that old women are not women.

    does that help?

    and ofc, because we live in a cis-normative society, many people dont often think about how women can also have dicks. forgetting about that isnt necessairily transphobic but might also just be a cis-normative oopsy.




  • oki, i just wrote a response but then realised i misunderstood you. sorry about that

    you are right, that also works

    my intention was to direct attention to how the image implies cis-normativity/transphobia. altho i do see how the image did that by simplifying reality for comical effect and while i dont think i played into similarly opressive structures, i did simply reality myself in my comment.