• 9 Posts
  • 98 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle


  • redrum@lemmy.mltoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    One of the ideological focus of the RAF was antifascism, which had been tolerated by the Federal Republic of Germany --e.g. it was founder of the NATO with other anticommunist bourgeous parliamentarian and fascists (Portugal) states–. Also, one of their most known actions was the kidnapping and execution of Hanns Martin Schleyer, an ex SS Official and, at that time, president of the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations and the Federation of German Industries.

    Aside from any ideological, tactical or strategic differences that you may have with the RAF. Valuing the organization based on the new ideological position of an ex-member more than 20 years later seems to me to be in bad taste.







  • The post was deleted by an admin [1] and the ‘rule 1’ should be the instance rule 1:

    1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

    1. Your comment on the Palestinian community, in my opinion, is a poor analysis of the historical and material conditions that have led to the current situation in Palestine. It ignores Zionism, colonialism, and the structural racism of Israel, both as a Zionist political project initially and as an effective state later.

    2. You repeatedly use ‘they’ in your comment, with these ‘they’ being the extremists. My interpretation of your comment is that it starts from the hypothesis that ‘extremism is bad’. I totally disagree. Often the extremists have been the vanguard of progress (people who believed that the earth revolved around the sun, ‘liberals’ willing to risk their lives cutting off the heads of kings and bishops…), although they can also be the vanguard of reaction (e.g. fascism).

    If points 1 and 2 are correct, the violation of rule 1 is easily derived (dog-whistle, Zionist apology, anti-Palestinian resistance…).

    IMHO, this only justifies deleting an elaborate comment if the community is defined as a safe space for Palestinians, they justifiably believe you are trolling, or they are flooded with similar messages. Otherwise, what the admin should have done is down-vote and reply for what they consider your argument to be toxic.

    PTB/BPR


    1. https://lemmy.ml/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=1288768 ↩︎






  • Sorry, could you post the relevant info?

    Posting Guidelines

    All posts should follow this basic structure:

    1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

    2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

    3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

    4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

    5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.


    Rules

    • Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.

    • Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.

    • Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.

    • Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.

    • Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.

    • You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.

    • If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.