• 31 Posts
  • 316 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 21st, 2025

help-circle

  • YES! Nextcloud is actually kinda good. I was skeptical for a long time, but I’ve changed my mind recently.

    If you don’t want to self-host (I’m not there yet, it seemed like a pain at first glance), then there are 2 online hosting providers that I’ve used recently.

    • nubo.coop fully manages Nextcloud for you, you just use it as a normal SaaS
    • northmail.ca also Nextcloud as a service, same as Nubo

    Nubo is in Europe, while Northmail is in Canada.

    They both offer email, notes, calendars, contacts, cloud file storage. Nubo also offers a tasks app, while Northmail doesn’t yet.

    I’m in the US, so Nubo was a little slow for me. I’ve been using Northmail for about 1 week now. Northmail’s Nextcloud instance is faster for me. Northmail also uses a way more recent version of Nextcloud. Nubo’s Nextcloud is pretty old. Northmail is also offering 100GB for $0.99 CAD per month, which is way more than Nubo.

    I had to move off Nubo because my bank doesn’t do international wires.

    If Northmail adds Nextcloud Tasks, then I will have everything I want from Northmail!















  • 😆😂🤣 Uuuuhh… Aaaah… I normally generate a random password and use it as my username for most services. Like even my bank.

    This is because I’ve realized the username is mostly useless and is just a handle for my account. It doesn’t matter to me if my username is jsmith, meow123, or kekxbek. In fact, it’s easier if I don’t have to come up with something novel or cool. Either way it goes in my password manager, so it’s not like I have to even remember it.

    I’m a real boy. I promise. Not a malicious bot.

    Although… If I were a malicious bot, that’s exactly what I would say! 😲




  • My use case is I want to write text and I want that text to be synced from my phone and laptop. I want to deploy the minimum number of services. I don’t care about any text editor features as long as I can write text and read it.

    I’ve already deployed Radicale and I’d rather not have to maintain anything else.

    I realize I can deploy something else just for notes, but I really don’t want to maintain something else.




  • FUTO specifically allows you to derive value from a project like this:

    You may use or modify the software only for non-commercial purposes such as personal use for research, experiment, and testing for the benefit of public knowledge, personal study, private entertainment, hobby projects, amateur pursuits, or religious observance, all without any anticipated commercial application.

    You may distribute the software or provide it to others only if you do so free of charge for non-commercial purposes.

    Yes, it’s a different set of value than Open Source™ gives you. Again, they’re not claiming to provide the same value as Open Source™. (They’re also not trying to replace Open Source™.) Yes, it’s not the value that you want. Yes, that’s by design.

    Do you also think, what’s the point of Google Search, Windows, WhatsApp, YouTube, Instagram, etc if you can’t derive any “value” from it, where “value” means Open Source™ value? Those apps are still insanely valuable to users, even if they don’t get Open Source™ value from them.



  • Ooooh, wait. I think I understood one of your points better now…

    I done (don’t?) own the code I contribute. Technically meaning if you contribute code, and use that snippet in a commercial context, again, your in violation of the license.

    So, I think you’re saying, what if you contribute some code to a source available project, maybe some boilerplate that’s the same everywhere, and then you use that same contribution in a commercial product? Then you’d be in violation of the source available license? Is that what you’re saying?

    This seems like a good reason NOT to contribute to a source available project, which is totally fine. Whereas this is possible with GPL if you 100% own the code and didn’t sign a CLA.

    However, not all projects are “I want everyone to pitch in and I want everyone to own the project.” There are lots of projects where 1 dude or 1 company want to retain ownership of their app and don’t need or want outside contributors. Normally, they’d probably just be closed source—maybe they might consider being source available.

    (Just as long as they don’t pretend to be Open Source™, in which case fuck them.)