I can’t believe you’ve done this.

My ADHD:

The legal term for this is constructive termination, i.e. fabricating a situation in which the natural result would be an employee leaving.

The point is normalization.

In places they don’t already own the news, their whole playbook has been to embrace, exaggerate, and extinguish. Making a mockery of it is the exaggerate part, and then a couple news cycles say more dumb shit to steal the limelight for the next news cycle.

By keeping the news flowing from one outrage to the next, communities can’t develop sufficient steam to hold them accountable, and each new outrage is only a little worse than the last.

You’ve really got to see the original video:

https://youtu.be/Rjab8fanzHc

Is this why you posted the same comment twice?

Once here

And the other here

Envious because I really wanted a bottle of that and only just missed the sale.

It should render in markdown, no?

Unordered list:

• Hyphen 1
• Hyphen 3

Ordered list:

1. Number 1
2. Number 2

In Voyager it auto-completed the items for me, and seems to render correctly:

In a 2012 paper, “Gödel’s Loophole”, F. E. Guerra-Pujol speculates that the problem involves Article V, which describes the process by which the Constitution can be amended. The loophole is that Article V’s procedures can be applied to Article V itself. It can therefore be altered in a “downward” direction, making it easier to alter the article again in the future.

This can be practically explored in a logic game called Nomic.

However, Russia claimed that “such flights greatly increase the likelihood of incidents in the airspace with aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces, which increases the risk of direct confrontation between the alliance and the Russian Federation,” adding that “NATO countries will be responsible for this.”

Like that one time a Russian Su tried to down a drone and inadvertently struck the propeller?

I’ve gone out to a couple of hours. I really have to have nothing to do or upcoming in order to enjoy it. When I do, it’s some of the most powerful orgasms I have.

I’ve seen it referred to as the Vomit Comet.

Formerly Liz_103 of Reddit.

Miss your creampie content :(

Spam.

There is, I am certain of it, a Rule 34 for this and you haven’t been brave enough to find it.

One NO NO is try to avoid having one of your shooting ropes to reach her hair. There seems to be a big taboo of even a bit of semen in the hair.

This is because it’s a pain in the ass to wash out, but if you time it when she’s planning to was her hair she might not mind as much.

One we all may have missed: the lettering on the ball!

I posit the posture isn’t too bad. She could be leaning on something out of frame.

Nice catch; I missed that.