Check the capacitors anyway please.

A giant thank you for reminding me of the now-ancient first-ever viral video - 405

No but maybe the C-level guys don’t need multiple millions while the actual developers don’t hardly get paid in comparison.

Eh, 80% of what this Dan fellow provides can’t be all that much…

I would like to set the question in a slight but impactful way:

“Do you truly believe the web would be better off in a world where Firefox no longer exists?”.

I would say no, that would be a damn shame. I will grant you, though, that Mozilla has lost its way and is no longer the respected steward of a fine browser that it used to be.

🎶 Es fährt ein Zug, nach Nirgendwo…

(and that’s all I can remember from the song, which I heard on the 80’s Hit parade)

I pretty much stopped playing OpenTTD once I figured out that doing only air traffic got me more cash than I could spend. Maybe that old version was just broken in that way, I don’t know…

Desktop environment, it’s what makes your bottom panel and window title look like they do, such as KDE or Gnome or Enlightenment, … and they’re also asking which skin/theme you’re using.

What kind of comms do the wires allow? Sending guidance and simultaneously receiving video?

What was the physicality of wires back then (and do you know what they are today)? Would it feel like walking into a spider’s web, or how sturdy were/are those wires?

How often would a write break, and would that mean total loss of control or is there some form of fall-back?

Curious minds want to know! Thank you.

Imagine walking into a spider’s web, and you couldn’t just wipe it off your face.

It’s a minor concern when a nation’s existence is on the line, but I do wonder how all those wires will affect the fauna and environment.

Curiously, the first wired torpedoes, you’d propel the torpedo forward by pulling on the wire that came out the back of it.

I have never put it into words like that, more like “make zero assumptions”.

I suppose that being overly thorough can make documentation prone to becoming tedious (unless cares is taken to not talk down to the reader) or too tightly coupled (incurring the need to be updated more often as details of the process change).

How do you usually deal with that aspect? What I do is to make the documentation easily skimmable (for advanced readers) and just accept the need for rework.

You’re brutal. You’re not wrong tho.

Adams family doorbell.

I had this exact argument about Day of Defeat back before Counterstrike got assimilated by Valve. I had no respect for all the bunny hopping in CS, but enjoyed the slow(er) gameplay and strict limitations of DoD (such as running 40 meters and then panting, very realistic representation of my own fitness lmao).

Precrime wioll haven be here.

Perhaps this is all just highly refined British humour?

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy skips lightly over this tangle of academic abstraction, pausing only to note that the term “Future Perfect” has been abandoned since it was discovered not to be.

It would be hilarious to see random civilians being casually followed by a policeman (policeperson?), overtly and cheerfully “nah mate, you haven’t done a thing. I’m just here to watch. For now. Carry on.”

Reluctant upvote

I’m grateful to you for digging those up.

Good on corpo for allowing that. That was after I left (and in a different country) so I wasn’t aware.