Ooh, I’ll check out RustDesk, thank you! My hope is that I’ll use this so infrequently that I won’t run into that issue, but good to have a backup. And LOVE that it’s open-source & self-hosted.

I was looking for something like this. The idea is:

1. Run an open model like LLAMA or Mistral on my home server
2. Access it from a client on my phone, saving my poor phone’s processor and battery.

Does something like this exist?

I guess I go to Guantanamo!

deleted by creator

I’ll do this, thank you!

Update: This now exists!!!

Vertical mouse. Been using it for 10+ years now and (I hope) it’s saved me from wrist injuries.

For the folks in here saying that Mozilla shouldn’t depend on the Google search deal: how much would you be willing to pay for Firefox to make up that $450 million annually? Because that’s your choice: either you pay, Google pays, or advertisers pay.

Good to know, thank you! I too, love boobies

TY! I’ll give that one another look. Can it export .fountain?

This is niche, but I really want a good FOSS screenwriting software that can rival Highland. There are some options like Trelby and others (because the Fountain syntax makes interchangeable screenplay files possible) but right now none of them are as good as Highland. A good alternative could let me finally leave Apple

I want to learn more about this! Searching for "bed backdoor " right now

Send is open source. I believe it’s a fork of Firefox Send

Same thing happened to the guy with the Ghostbusters license plate

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/ghostbusters-inspired-license-plate-gives-ny-man-toll-headache/5503912/

This is a good policy but it should only be available to people who make 34.5% of the median national wage or else people might abuse it

Removed by mod

You know Trump wanted to kill him, right?

I enjoy writing and reading critiques of American power (including yours!) on fora like this one, and I think these spaces are valuable for education, radicalization, and organization. I consider this an example of freedom of speech. I also think we risk losing these freedoms under Trump. Do you disagree?

Isn’t he on a beach right now

I hope we continue to live in a world where you can criticize the powerful

There are reports that Trump, while president, wanted to shoot protestors. Reports say that Trump toned down his requests “after Attorney General William Barr and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley pushed back on his initial request.” There are similar reports about McMaster and other chumps who reined in the absolute worst dogshit instincts of Trump.

I don’t think these guys disagreed with Trump because they’re good people with good values. I think they did it because they’re authoritarians who got high on the pop Americana of Top Gun and Air Force One and believe America Is Freedom, and “You don’t shoot people who are protesting*” is one of those freedoms. Or, at the very least, it’s supposed to distinguish us from the international foes that these guys have always whined about.

(*Depending on who is protesting and what they even count as a protest. But I have been to dozens of protest marches, I was just at a Gaza march with thousands of people in New York, and I’ve never once worried about being shot for holding a sign and chanting.)

It’s worth noting that a lot of these guys, like Milley, predated Trump’s time in office. I think part of the reason Trump kept these guys around is because he straight-up sucks at hiring. This report highlights the difficulties of passing his loyalty test, but I recall another one (I can’t find it now) that said that during the transition, the Trump team was shocked to learn that they had to hire hundreds of people. They thought everyone came with the office. Trump was so inexperienced at it that he ended up asking Obama for advice.

None of that is the case the second time around. The folks who stay on do it knowing what Trump wants, and knowing that he’ll be empowered to get it. And unlike 2016, there’s a plan. Project 2025 has been vetting people for civil service roles, and Schedule F means that Trump could effectively sideline or fire any civil servants who want to slow-walk his agenda. The Supreme Court has already given him the greenlight with the Trump v. U.S. ruling. And, just earlier today, Trump again spoke of deploying the military against his political foes. No one who is joining this administration is doing it because they have some Jerry Bruckheimer view of America’s freedom. They all know the score this time around.

There’s one more reason that Trump’s hands were partially tied during his admin. Pema Levy at Mother Jones wrote about it in the context of January 6, but I think it applies to his administration generally:

Trump’s coup failed not because he and his allies lacked power, but because President Joe Biden’s margin of victory was big enough that some allies—including his own attorney general and most Senate Republicans—refused to use that power to illegally keep Trump in office.

Trump has never won a popular vote. If that were to change-- if he were to win the election by a majority, rather than just by picking up electoral votes in our shitty system-- then I can’t think of a single thing that would stop Trump from getting everything he wants. The small measures of freedom that some people in this country have eked out (the right to form a union, or protest, or publish criticism of the government), the launching pad from which most of our other freedoms and liberties have advanced or been protected, would be totally wiped out, and there would be no one to stop it.