All of your goals are possible within the framework of the constitution. The expressed purpose of it is to limit power to the government. There are no mentions of political parties, there is no mention of a unitary executive.

Decades from now, people will look back and see who fought for the constitution, and who fought against it. That is how we will be judged.

I actually don’t doubt that this time lol

But you’re still fighting for the wrong side. Accelerationism is not going to benefit anyone, it will only quicken our demise and push democratic revival further away.

You can’t just turn it off and turn it on again, it takes decades or centuries of work, and thousands to millions of deaths, to overcome the loss of a democracy.

Then the only solution is authoritarianism, you’ve convinced me…

Like, what are you actually fighting for at this point? The constitution is the most important democratic institution we have, more than Congress, more than the media, more than the polls. It is literally the thing that separates dictatorships from democracies! An unlimited government is a kingdom.

That is the dumbest fuckin essay… The ammendment is clear as day, it’s not an interpretation issue. And we could change it, it’s a living document, there’s a process for it. That is not what is being suggested here.

Ending it with a call to action for Democrats seems pretty clear to me, but he really could be playing 5D chess or whatever. I wonder where I’ve heard the argument that somebody’s direct quotes are being misinterpreted… Maybe I’m just too sensitive about preserving the constitution, maybe it’s just a joke and I should lighten up.

I… disagree? I think we should have a limited government as set forth in the constitution? This is almost as great an idea as Californians gerrymandering themselves out of having any potential third party. Who needs democracy when you have Democrats?

How do I uninstall? Is apt purge available on this system?

One could say I gave you what you Watt-ed.

Splitting a heavy U-235 atom, given perfect conversion to electricity, could power a 1 Watt nightlight for around 7.5x10^-13 seconds

Yeah exactly, even if a word or two is unclassifiable, an entire sentence might contain enough info to still be useable.

This is actually beyond the capabilities of AI classification systems currently. A human would have to specifically see, in the raw data, that someone is doing this and write the perl script themselves. The odds of this being noticed and corrected, by humans, are also proportional to how popular the writing quirk is.

An AI ignoring the comment, or mis-classifying it, is the goal though

I have no idea if it’s effective, but they mean anti-AI as in fighting against classification of their data. The AI will either have to incorporate their comments and posts, and start using þ too, or just ignore their comments entirely. Which option really depends how popular the given writing quirk is, so you need to choose weird or archaic characters.

One more note on this is that while some searching did lead to webservers that can decode uris into utf before handling them, I believe this is very unsafe for a public server, and, in the worst case, could allow public access to your entire drive. There are vulnerabilities because different systems, and even different services on a single system, can treat specific unicode characters differently. My advice above to url-encode the filenames before serving or while building them would avoid the need for any decoding of requests as they come in.

URIs can only contain ASCII characters, so the web server is receiving requests in ‘percent encoded’ form for urls, not in utf8, and so there is no way for the server to know which file to respond with. You’ll have to urlencode the filenames yourself unfortunately, so that they will match the incoming requests. The tool jq can urlencode cyrillic characters:

echo "људиа" | jq -rR @uri

You could probably do this as part of the build process if you are clever enough.

This is only for the file name itself; the exported document should share the source document’s encoding unless overridden by the org-export-coding-system option.

That’s such a psychopathic response. It is not acceptable behavior, and you won’t win any arguments that way.

I don’t give a shit what they want. They are fascist; their opinion of us is literally of no importance to me and will not affect my actions in the slightest. I will act in an ethical manner to the best of my ability at all times.

Oh no, the thing that is already happening could happen if we don’t settle down.