nice

Nice try but no proof yet if the fuckery field is irrational.

I always loved coming across “&c” in (older) writings. Like how can we make “etc” any shorter?

On a related note, the ampersand originated as a ligature of “et”.

Today agree. Gives a great texture and light sweetness. They are a staple building block at my house but I’ve only seen them in specialty sandwiches IRL.

No.

TBH I’ve never been able to get them to taste as good as they did when I was a kid.

It’s because I became a man of the world.

Epstein famously received an unprecedented federal non-prosecution plea deal in 2008. There were dozens of victims who had come forward in those charges, but they (along with anyone else who hadn’t come forward) were instantly disenfranchised by that deal. The prosecutor who arranged that plea deal was Alex Acosta (who went on to serve as Labor Secretary under Trump 45 🤔).

Google gave me mostly AI slop and pop psychology, but this article is an in-depth summary of the literature on the topic of inner speech, for anyone interested (and dedicated - it’s long and very technical).

It doesn’t seem to justify dichotomizing people into those who “have it” and those who don’t. Research looks mostly focused on what cognitive or developmental purpose it serves.

Inner speech can be defined as the subjective experience of language in the absence of overt and audible articulation. This definition is necessarily simplistic: as the following will demonstrate, experiences of this kind vary widely in their phenomenology, their addressivity to others, their relation to the self, and their similarity to external speech.

So, it’s on a spectrum, highly subjective, and difficult to talk about with precision.

I personally do not normally think in words, but I certainly rehearse/relive conversations. I also complain to myself with words when I am really miserable, I think it’s comforting to “say it out loud” (inside). Do I have an inner monologue?

not okay

None-reshaping pytorch tensors is confusing and marvelous and I fucking love it, but not until I’ve spent an hour each time convincing myself it’s doing what I intended. But after that hour WHOO MAN do I feel smart.

Good article, apparently this guy was like 80 years before Sammy Hagar and Ozzy Osborne. Ahead of his time for sure.

Previously, the POWER system managed to use a laser to beam 230 watts across one mile (1.7 km) for 25 seconds, and an undisclosed lesser amount of power as far as 2.3 miles (3.7 km). Now, DARPA has managed to increase this to 800 watts for 30 seconds at a distance of 5.3 miles (8.6 km).

Apropos since this has always been my mental image of RACI modeling:

FWIW, I just learned that escalator and kerosene started as trademarked brand names.

Lesgo?

index -> indices matrix -> matrices codex -> codices appendix -> appendices

I think that would be the plural of Kleenus.

What did you do with all that toilet paper, though?

Yeah, I keep wondering if this is still going to be published, it’s been on my pull list for ages. Saw it being plugged in CSN - twice. Hope it sees daylight.

I concur

Expected “soft liberalism” to mean neoliberalism or watered-down liberalism, but apparently it refers to wokism. “Top democrats“ blaming defund the police, DEI, and soft border policies.

I guess the message is that Trump won on racism, so we should have been more racist.