• 183 Posts
  • 52 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: March 29th, 2025
  • dwazou@lemm.eetoNews@lemmy.world•Bill Gates to give away $200 billion by 2045, accuses Musk of harming world's poor
    131·
    2 days ago

    Bill Gates is probably one of the best billionaires. But it is very important that we all remember how he ended up with $200 billion dollars. Predatory monopolistic behavior.

    Everyone should carefully read this 1999 article that I found in the archives of the New York Times.

    How Microsoft Sought Friends In Washington - Nov. 7, 1999

    Twenty months ago, Representative Billy Tauzin walked into the office of William H. Gates 3rd, chairman of Microsoft, bearing a 10 inch by 10 inch white box and a warning.

    Mr. Tauzin, Republican of Louisiana and the chairman of a subcommittee that oversees the telecommunications industry, placed the box on Mr. Gates’s desk. Inside was a lemon meringue pie, a reminder of another pie that had been thrown in Mr. Gates’s face several weeks earlier by a Microsoft critic. The message to Mr. Gates, the richest man on earth and the leader of the digital world, was blunt: You need to make friends in Washington.

    Mr. Gates apparently took Mr. Tauzin’s message to heart – with a vengeance. While Microsoft and its executives contributed a relatively modest $60,000 to Republican Party committees in 1997, those contributions shot up to $470,000 as part of the company’s overall political contribution of $1.3 million in 1998. The 1998 figure included donations to political candidates, with the bulk of the money going to Republicans. This year, the company’s contributions of nearly $600,000 have been more evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats, according to Federal Election Commission records.

    Mr. Gates and his top lieutenants have made dozens of trips to Washington, cultivating powerful figures in both parties and hiring some of the city’s priciest lobbyists. Microsoft has retained Haley Barbour, former chairman of the Republican National Committee; Vic Fazio, a former Democratic congressman from California; Vin Weber, a former Republican congressman from Minnesota; Tom Downey, a former Democratic congressman from New York and a close friend of Vice President Al Gore; Mark Fabiani, former special counsel to the Clinton White House; and Kerry Knott, former chief of staff to Representative Dick Armey of Texas, the House majority leader.

    Microsoft has also given hundreds of thousands of dollars to research groups, trade groups, polling operations, public relations concerns and grass-roots organizations. It has financed op-ed pieces and full-page newspaper advertisements, and mounted a lobbying effort against an increase in the Justice Department’s antitrust enforcement budget.

    In June, Mr. Gates met for lunch with the Republican leaders of the House in the small whip’s room off the House chamber. They discussed Microsoft’s public policy agenda, ranging from exports of encryption software to Internet privacy to antitrust actions, said several participants at the meeting. Mr. Knott, now a top official in Microsoft’s Washington office, attended the session.

    Eight days later, Mr. Armey introduced what he called his ‘‘e-Contract,’’ a list of Republican legislative initiatives that pointedly adopted Microsoft’s view of the role of government antitrust actions, like the one that now threatens to dismantle Microsoft.

    Microsoft has hired as two former heads of the Justice Department’s antitrust division and a dozen or more prominent academics and writers, who publish articles and give interviews advocating Microsoft’s position.

    Among them are Charles Rule, director of the Justice Department’s antitrust division in the Bush administration, and Paul Rothstein, a professor of law at Georgetown University and frequent network and cable-television commentator.

    Another Microsoft move on Capitol Hill drew criticism for heavy-handedness. Its lobbying to trim the antitrust division’s budget brought a flurry of editorial condemnation. The Washington Post said Microsoft’s actions were ‘‘a comical caricature’’ of a company trying to bully its way through Washington.‘’

    One Justice Department official said, ‘‘Even the mob doesn’t try to whack a prosecutor during a trial.’’

    https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/07/us/us-versus-microsoft-the-strategy-how-microsoft-sought-friends-in-washington.html

  • dwazou@lemm.eetoNews@lemmy.world•Bill Gates to give away $200 billion by 2045, accuses Musk of harming world's poor
    11·
    2 days ago

    Out of all the wealthiest american businessmen, Bill Gates and Michel Bloomberg are some of those I admire the most. They have spent an absolutely tremendous amount of money to support the World Health Organization and doctors around the world. Bloomberg used his personal fortune to support poor countries that were sued by tobacco companies.

    However, it’s extremely important to remember HOW Mister William Henry III “Bill” Gates became worth $200 billion dollars. This man’s dream was to create a private sales tax on every single computer sold around the world.

    “But I use Linux ! I’m not giving him my money”

    Even if you use Linux, you still are. You eat food ? Your supermarket? Yeah, the supermarket companies pay billions of dollars for the right to use Microsoft Windows and Office. Your government? Yeah. They pay billions for the same. Your local university? Yeah. They must pay. You are paying. Directly or indirectly. Whether you like or not.

    The United States once tried to dismantle Microsoft. The case was overwhelming.

    How did Bill Gates save Microsoft from antitrust ? Read this articled that was originally published in 1999:

    How Microsoft Sought Friends In Washington

    Twenty months ago, Representative Billy Tauzin walked into the office of William H. Gates 3rd, chairman of Microsoft, bearing a 10 inch by 10 inch white box and a warning.

    Mr. Tauzin, Republican of Louisiana and the chairman of a subcommittee that oversees the telecommunications industry, placed the box on Mr. Gates’s desk. Inside was a lemon meringue pie, a reminder of another pie that had been thrown in Mr. Gates’s face several weeks earlier by a Microsoft critic. The message to Mr. Gates, the richest man on earth and the leader of the digital world, was blunt: You need to make friends in Washington.

    Mr. Gates apparently took Mr. Tauzin’s message to heart – with a vengeance. While Microsoft and its executives contributed a relatively modest $60,000 to Republican Party committees in 1997, those contributions shot up to $470,000 as part of the company’s overall political contribution of $1.3 million in 1998. The 1998 figure included donations to political candidates, with the bulk of the money going to Republicans. This year, the company’s contributions of nearly $600,000 have been more evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats, according to Federal Election Commission records.

    Mr. Gates and his top lieutenants have made dozens of trips to Washington, cultivating powerful figures in both parties and hiring some of the city’s priciest lobbyists. Microsoft has retained Haley Barbour, former chairman of the Republican National Committee; Vic Fazio, a former Democratic congressman from California; Vin Weber, a former Republican congressman from Minnesota; Tom Downey, a former Democratic congressman from New York and a close friend of Vice President Al Gore; Mark Fabiani, former special counsel to the Clinton White House; and Kerry Knott, former chief of staff to Representative Dick Armey of Texas, the House majority leader.

    Microsoft has also given hundreds of thousands of dollars to research groups, trade groups, polling operations, public relations concerns and grass-roots organizations. It has financed op-ed pieces and full-page newspaper advertisements, and mounted a lobbying effort against an increase in the Justice Department’s antitrust enforcement budget.

    In June, Mr. Gates met for lunch with the Republican leaders of the House in the small whip’s room off the House chamber. They discussed Microsoft’s public policy agenda, ranging from exports of encryption software to Internet privacy to antitrust actions, said several participants at the meeting. Mr. Knott, now a top official in Microsoft’s Washington office, attended the session.

    Eight days later, Mr. Armey introduced what he called his ‘‘e-Contract,’’ a list of Republican legislative initiatives that pointedly adopted Microsoft’s view of the role of government antitrust actions, like the one that now threatens to dismantle Microsoft.

    Microsoft has hired as two former heads of the Justice Department’s antitrust division and a dozen or more prominent academics and writers, who publish articles and give interviews advocating Microsoft’s position.

    Among them are Charles Rule, director of the Justice Department’s antitrust division in the Bush administration, and Paul Rothstein, a professor of law at Georgetown University and frequent network and cable-television commentator.

    Another Microsoft move on Capitol Hill drew criticism for heavy-handedness. Its lobbying to trim the antitrust division’s budget brought a flurry of editorial condemnation. The Washington Post said Microsoft’s actions were ‘‘a comical caricature’’ of a company trying to bully its way through Washington.‘’

    One Justice Department official said, ‘‘Even the mob doesn’t try to whack a prosecutor during a trial.’’

    https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/07/us/us-versus-microsoft-the-strategy-how-microsoft-sought-friends-in-washington.html

  • dwazou@lemm.eetoTechnology@lemmy.world•Apple Watch Shipments’ Continuous DeclineEnglish
    7·
    2 days ago

    As much as I dislike Windows and smartphones the current nature of the world is that that are all necessities for most people.

    I was told Linux is incredibly difficult to use, Windows is so much safer/better.

    Honestly, I used to believe this, until I installed Linux. Well, I was just lied to. I very easily installed everything that I need. My Linux distro works just fine. I can even play my favorite games. To this day, I haven’t moved back to Windows. The Microsoft empire is based on aggressive lobbying and advertising, not on superior product quality.

    Billionaire-owned multinational corporations spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year on advertising. They have entire teams that study consumer psychology. The goal of advertising is to undermine human rationality.

    If humans were purely rational, why would they waste billions on advertising ?

    They would just say “here are our products. Here are our prices. Buy them if you want to”.

    Smartphones are also the easiest way to access your banking services with plenty of banks offering online banking now.

    I don’t need to access my banking services 24/7. I have cash and a debit card that does the job. If I need to see my bank account, I just use my computer.

    What you need and what you think you need are not the same things.

  • dwazou@lemm.eetoFrance@jlai.lu•Suite bureautique souveraineFrançais
    61·
    3 days ago

    Je te conseille d’écrire aux dirigeants de ton fournisseur d’accès par courrier recommandé. Fais un véritable courrier, bien argumenté, poli. Tu peux utiliser La Poste pour l’envoyer online.

    Les cadres supérieurs sont toujours étonnés de recevoir du courrier de consommateurs lambda.

    Mais c’est fondamentalement une bonne chose.

  • dwazou@lemm.eetoQuébec@lemmy.ca•Panne informatique | Les services de la SAAQ toujours paralysés, Québec blâme Microsoft
    3·
    3 days ago

    Totalement d’accord 🙌

    Mais il ne faut pas que rêver. Il faut aussi s’impliquer en politique.

    C’est dur. C’est ingrat. C’est parfois brutal. Mais la seule et unique facon de changer les choses.

    Tous les changements positifs - tous - ont uniquement eu lieu car des gens motivés sont rentrés dans l’arène.

    Dans mon pays, il n’y a pas de paquets de cigarettes neutres comme au Québec. Les compagnies de tabac en profitent pour faire du marketing intense qui cible les jeunes. Pourquoi on a pas de paquet neutre ? Car chez nous, il n’y a pas eu une mobilisation intense et massive de la société.

    Dans mon pays, l’avortement est totalement illégal. On envoie des milliers de femmes en prison. On est comme la France avant l’année 1975 ou le Canada avant l’année 1969. Pourquoi c’est illégal ? Parce que chez nous, il n’y a pas eu une mobilisation intense et massive de la société.

    On peut obtenir du changement, mais uniquement si les gens s’impliquent tous et combattent ✌️.

  • dwazou@lemm.eetoTechnology@lemmy.world•Apple Watch Shipments’ Continuous DeclineEnglish
    107·
    3 days ago

    Wonderful news. That means less electronic junk to recycle, much less pollution.

    I’m actually quiet happy to own a dumbphone and no smartwatch. Having a powerful Linux laptop is great, but I came to the conclusion humans need low-tech for their mental health. Not having tech around me helps me focus, go on nice walks, write what’s on my mind and read books. I just feel happier.

    If you aren’t careful, the things you own can end up owning you.