Lol how is this a fair comparison? 10 mins of watching 4k vs 1 AI question does not seem equivalent at all. Like you could change the quantities and make the comparison look as bad as you want. Why not compare 1 min of 4k video vs asking AI 1,000 questions? Why not compare 1 hr of 4k video to 10 AI questions? When you’re changing the variables around between comparisons like that then the comparison is worthless.

Besides that, the environmentally damaging part of AI isn’t asking it questions, it’s training the models themselves. Training AI uses huge resource consuming supercomputers and can take days.

“I may be Jewish, but at least I’m not a jezebel”

Now that’s a sentence with some baggage.

Excedrin is one of the more popular brand names. They’re specifically advertised for headaches.

This is a similar to energy saying “all lives matter” when someone says “Black Lives Matter.”

Your argument falls apart when you remember that “women” aren’t some isolated, homogenous block. Women are investors, lenders, vendors, employees, political associates, foreign leaders, clients, etc. They exist in every single demographic you claim we should be paying more attention to. Erasing “women” from the conversation doesn’t make your assessment broader. It erases the reality that women are part of every single group you’re describing, and Trump has assaulted multiple members of those groups.

Also, if we did remove women from the equation entirely, Trump has still exploited people from every imaginable class, nationality, and background. The problem isn’t that he’s being judged “only” through the lens of women, it’s that you’re suggesting women’s perspectives are somehow less valid when they’re the ones disproportionately targeted and disbelieved.

“How whiteness makes you gay”

I propose that anyone defending themselves in court over AI stealing data must be represented exclusively by AI.

It’s not the best system, it’s the most addictive.

Women have already come forward and had their lives destroyed. If the general public believed them during their trials, or honestly, if they weren’t intimidated into dropping their case, this shit would already be in prison.

But the testimony of women is valued less by the justice system than the testimony of rich powerful men. That’s the problem. There is less trust in women overall, across the board in this patriarchal society.

Actually, most of us can tell the difference between a committed sex trafficker and the actual sex slaves she helped traffic.

If this does get said in her defense, it will be bad faith, and the only people that repeat it will be MAGA loyalists.

Yeah but when victims do expose themselves, it’d be nice if a bunch of online shit heads didn’t constantly chant 'women are liars! They only want money!"

Nice ad homin, I’m definitely going to take your opinion seriously now!

Oh, I tried this on shower thoughts. Get ready to read some depressing comments.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3502

He didn’t even dodge his own bullets! /s

In the hypothetical scenario that this is the whole truth, what you’re doing is victim blaming.

It’s usually people who were victims of past abuse, too.

Especially past childhood abuse.

I think they’re being sarcastic…

It’s the people’s instrument!

There have also been several studies that also prove this.

Your driving after being awake for 24 hours is as impacted as though you had a 0.1% BAC (0.08% is the legal limit).

That’s very streets behind thinking.