Holograms are programs that run on a computer. They have no physical form, they are force fields and light being projected from a piece of hardware bolted to the wall to convince you they have form, but their true “self” is just data in a computer like any other program. Their experiences are database entries. They can be deleted, copied, transmitted, paused and restarted like any other program. They are incapable of doing anything that the computer they’re running on can’t do.
Isn’t this true of humans in the world as well?
They run on a meat computer, and are limited in their capabilities to what that meat computer and meat suit can do.
Humans can be paused, deleted, and restarted. The many different transporter fuck ups kinda prove that. The only thing stopping it from being a norm is safeties, which have been circumvented before and will be again.
Human memories are also manipulatable. They’ve proven to be deletable, injectable, editable.
It really feels like your argument is “they are digital so can’t be alive.” Which seems very anti Trek.
It’s less that digital things can’t be alive and more that to be alive you need to exist independent of technology that’s simulating your life for you. All biological organisms pass this test. Data passes this test. The Doctor and every other hologram does not.
If you want to call the human body and perception an equivalent, I’ll point out that when you cut yourself something has actually occurred to your physical body, it isn’t just your brain seeing a knife and deciding it hurt you.
But hey, you are welcome to disagree at which point holodecks become extremely unethical. This is, after all, just philosophy.
Isn’t this true of humans in the world as well?
They run on a meat computer, and are limited in their capabilities to what that meat computer and meat suit can do.
Humans can be paused, deleted, and restarted. The many different transporter fuck ups kinda prove that. The only thing stopping it from being a norm is safeties, which have been circumvented before and will be again.
Human memories are also manipulatable. They’ve proven to be deletable, injectable, editable.
It really feels like your argument is “they are digital so can’t be alive.” Which seems very anti Trek.
It’s less that digital things can’t be alive and more that to be alive you need to exist independent of technology that’s simulating your life for you. All biological organisms pass this test. Data passes this test. The Doctor and every other hologram does not.
If you want to call the human body and perception an equivalent, I’ll point out that when you cut yourself something has actually occurred to your physical body, it isn’t just your brain seeing a knife and deciding it hurt you.
But hey, you are welcome to disagree at which point holodecks become extremely unethical. This is, after all, just philosophy.