• banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Won? They will do it again. The only winning move is not to play their game. Choose Free Software.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Genuine question: What do you recommend? I want to replace Windows 10 on a 8-year-old midrange laptop with something that works reasonably well in terms of performance with a connected 4K monitor.

      I’ve already tried Ubuntu, but unfortunately the experience has been marred by bugs such as poor performance, visual glitches, windows jumping around when attempting to move them, and DPI settings not being able to be applied per screen.

      • IzzuThug@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Linux is definitely the route. A lot of people use Mint or Ubuntu. But they are usually running out of date drivers.

        I’d recommend looking into distros based on Fedora Workstation. It stays up to date but not as much as Arch so that it’s stable.

        My recommendation is any of the Universal Blue images that fit your need. They are based off of the Fedora Atomic image with added quality of life features.

      • banazir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I can’t say I’ve had those issues myself, so my recommendation may not be valid in your case. I’d say maybe give Fedora with KDE Plasma a try, and try switching between X11 and Wayland sessions if issues persist.

        I personally don’t like Ubuntu, but that’s mostly because of Canonical making the occasional sketchy decision.

        On the whole, distro choice doesn’t matter quite as much these days, as most distros should work fine out of the box. Whatever issues you have should technically be solvable with a bit of troubleshooting.

        Sometimes Linux just doesn’t play well with your setup. Good luck, and I hope you find something that works for you!

      • maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If you identify your laptop (including model number) someone who has the same hardware might be able to make a solid recommendation.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I won? Of course I did, I don’t use Windows anymore, I’ve been using Linux for years now.

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    Like, even if they do listen to the community, it still isn’t good enough for the Linux shills on here.

    God, the Linux community is so uptight. It really doesn’t do FOSS any favour acting like this.

    It would be less bad if they could all agree to one recommended distro, but even that is an impossibility.

    • absentbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Your problem with the Linux community is that there’s a lot of options? I cannot understand how that’s a bad thing. If there was only one distro it would be the same as now, but with less diversity.

      The reason this isn’t good enough is that it’s a shallow capitulation by a company still massively over invested in AI. Nobody believes Microsoft is actually going to give up on shoving AI down people’s throats, they’re just gonna be more subtle about it now.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Too little too late. I’m already over to Linux now. Shit’s been going downhill even before this whole AI craze went off the rails. I hope Microsoft Windows crashes and burns

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    After pushback from users? Or after realising how much it’s costing them on the server end?

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve won when everybody gets the principles of free software philosophy, along with other essential freedoms, free roaming, free speech, free assembly, free press, free energy, free healthcare, etc.

    It’s the freedom.

    Free to use, study, share, change.

    The Free Software Definition

    The free software definition presents the criteria for whether a particular software program qualifies as free software. From time to time we revise this definition, to clarify it or to resolve questions about subtle issues. See the History section below for a list of changes that affect the definition of free software.

    The four essential freedoms

    A program is free software if the program’s users have the four essential freedoms: [1]

    • The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
    • The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
    • The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
    • The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

    A program is free software if it gives users adequately all of these freedoms. Otherwise, it is nonfree. While we can distinguish various nonfree distribution schemes in terms of how far they fall short of being free, we consider them all equally unethical.

    In any given scenario, these freedoms must apply to whatever code we plan to make use of, or lead others to make use of. For instance, consider a program A which automatically launches a program B to handle some cases. If we plan to distribute A as it stands, that implies users will need B, so we need to judge whether both A and B are free. However, if we plan to modify A so that it doesn’t use B, only A needs to be free; B is not pertinent to that plan.

    ^ from https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

  • Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “This is going very poorly, we will pretend to listen to our customers so it looks like we are course correcting, winning favor with investors and customers (big businesses, not home users).”

    They may even switch CEOs if the situation worsens, but the practices remain.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Understand that they’re not doing this because of user feedback; they’re doing this because shareholders got cold feet about the whole thing after the backlash (so indirectly it’s still down to user feedback, but not really)