• Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Netflix says the buy would give users more choice”

    In a world with real journalism the very next question would be how but we just spread the normalization and allow the little lies.

  • SomeRandomNoob@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Netflix has 300 million subscribers. Buying WB for $80 Billions means every subscriber has to pay at least ~266$ for Netflix to break even. That’s about $4.50 per month per subscriber if you spread it out over 5 years. Get ready for for some price hikes.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I was really hoping for HBO to be the ones to tackle a Stormlight Archive adaptation. I no longer do.

  • stretch2m@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Shiver me timbers! Netflix is the last streaming service I’ve kept, because it (so far) hasn’t started showing me ads. I REFUSE TO PAY FOR ADS! Also, when they jack up the price from this merger, I’m out.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am not sure that’s what anyone wanted when they said there are too many different streaming services.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Companies not to vertically integrate. Production studios should produce movies, and streaming platforms should provide a platform for people to access movies. If Spotify made its own music it would be absurd, right? Well, yeah.

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        The various media owners to lease out their licenses to a small handful of competing services and for the streaming services to choose which material was worth the lease cost to stay competitive.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is the best possible outcome out of a very shitty list. They haf to sell, Disney already owns too much, Jeff Bezos would monetize it in the worst possible ways, and Larry Ellison is the most evil billionaire in the US. Yes, much worse than Elon, Zuck, Bezos, etc.

    EDIT: Unfortunately Larry Ellison could still buy the global division which includes CNN. Netflix is only buying the studios and streaming. Still no idea what happens to DC Comics but I think it goes with global?

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        He’s already doing that with CBS News, minus the “-lite.” We are going to see full-on MAGA media propaganda on a national broadcast channel from now on, not just in the news, but in their programming.

        TV programming is already very conservative, with all their Copaganda. Now it’s going to get much, much worse.

  • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is actually worse than even Paramount aquiring them.

    Both were shit, but this is hands down the worst possible outcome.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      i see them dumping every new show after 1-2 seasons. only keeping the ones that gives the most subscription sign ups.

    • golli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is it? Paramount+Larry Ellison+the Saudis was not a particular great alternative either. I guess only time will tell, how this turns out.

      With Paramount I think there would have been the risk of WB remaining in a similar form, but being ideologically twisted.

      With Netflix or course there is a larger risk towards theatrical and physical releases as it goes against their primary business model. And the biggest threat to creativity is not ideology, but in a way the opposite. Lack thereof and instead focus on just metrics like short term viewership numbers.

      The best option out of the bad ones would have probably been something like Comcast. Or in my dreams wb would have just stayed independent, splitting of linear assets. They have a ton of debt, but imo eventually they’d have been strong enough to survive. Bur I guess sadly this wasn’t the most lucrative path.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        with NUTREK being so poorly made as it is, paramount/ellison might finally either try to astroturf it or shut down the franchise. isnt physical release where all the pirating is sourced from, or at least most of them.

  • flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    “More choice”?

    You mean, nearly all of the properties WB helped run into the ground? That’s not really much of more choice.