My argument is that you misunderstood, because of your reading capabilities. For anyone with proper reading comprehension, that’s kinda evident from reading this thread.
You have been arguing by trying to have it both ways.
You claim the author gave a suggestion of what is inside black holes. I asserted that the suggestion doesn’t meet the criteria of a suggestion for a scientific article and therefore isn’t a suggestion.
You then respond with the equivalent of, “I’m not the author and not defending the content.”
This is Space, not Astrology. The criteria for article content is higher.
Back to commenting on the content, despite me not at any point talking about it with you. I merely pointed out you read it poorly — which you did. Now stop crying over it and just leave rhe thread alone if you’re so ashamed.
Jesus fucking hell. You just can’t accept you made mistake while reading. I really hope you are 15-25. If you’re over 26 and still this childishly stubborn because you’re incapable of accepting you make mistakes, then you’ll be like that as long as you live. Fucking eww.
You didn’t understand what the author meant. You were wrong that they “just restated the definition”.
Carry on with your tantrum if you want man, it won’t change you having been wrong.
You don’t understand context even. Sheesh. This is what I mean by you having a shit reading level.
Yes, it is.
I arguing that you didn’t understand the article. Then you reply to that by disagreeing with the thing you misunderstood.
You don’t have an argument so you deflect and insult.
My argument is that you misunderstood, because of your reading capabilities. For anyone with proper reading comprehension, that’s kinda evident from reading this thread.
You have been arguing by trying to have it both ways.
You claim the author gave a suggestion of what is inside black holes. I asserted that the suggestion doesn’t meet the criteria of a suggestion for a scientific article and therefore isn’t a suggestion.
You then respond with the equivalent of, “I’m not the author and not defending the content.”
This is Space, not Astrology. The criteria for article content is higher.
It very clearly does.
If you can’t see that you’re illiterate.
Then you get mad at me pointing that out and start crying for apologies online. Fucking lol
A suggestion in a scientific paper isn’t anything you pull out of your ass.
Back to commenting on the content, despite me not at any point talking about it with you. I merely pointed out you read it poorly — which you did. Now stop crying over it and just leave rhe thread alone if you’re so ashamed.
“apologise to meeeee REEEEEEEE”
You just commented on the content. You can’t have it both ways.
You comment on the content by claiming he gave a suggestion.
Jesus fucking hell. You just can’t accept you made mistake while reading. I really hope you are 15-25. If you’re over 26 and still this childishly stubborn because you’re incapable of accepting you make mistakes, then you’ll be like that as long as you live. Fucking eww.
You didn’t understand what the author meant. You were wrong that they “just restated the definition”.
Carry on with your tantrum if you want man, it won’t change you having been wrong.