Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoChoose your fighterimagemessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down128
arrow-up1372arrow-down1imageChoose your fighterTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square91linkfedilink
minus-square[deleted]@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·2 months agoThat would cut down on the number of memes available, since the sources are often censored. I think we should require someone posting a censored meme add additional censorship to make the message appear more potentially offensive.
minus-squareTachyonTele@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agoIm all for covering the censorship with worse words
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoif you’re not going to put in the time to add a nice set of grawlixes, why censor at all?
minus-squareM137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoThe vast majority of the time it would take a couple of seconds to just uncensor the words. There’s no need to keep the censorship, anyone here could easily do it.
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoIf someone is somehow so inept that they can’t uncensor a meme then they have so serious issues.
That would cut down on the number of memes available, since the sources are often censored.
I think we should require someone posting a censored meme add additional censorship to make the message appear more potentially offensive.
Im all for covering the censorship with worse words
if you’re not going to put in the time to add a nice set of grawlixes, why censor at all?
The vast majority of the time it would take a couple of seconds to just uncensor the words. There’s no need to keep the censorship, anyone here could easily do it.
If someone is somehow so inept that they can’t uncensor a meme then they have so serious issues.