• Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Who the fuck “enhanced” this photo? It’s creepy af.

    • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I was thinking that this looks really off like AI usually does.

      From wikipedia:

      Why not just use the original? That is such a weird choice. This isn’t even the first time I’ve seen something like this, here someone AI’d over an existing meme for reasons that I don’t understand.

      • PlantPowerPhysicist@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The original photo contains so much more personality! Even if there’s dust and blemishes, compare the subtle smile and how his eyes actually look like they’re focused on something in the original vs the weird-ass AI replicant

        • Ech@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          I swear these people would look at people/themselves irl and think, “I need to ‘upscale’ this.”