cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/1236359

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.nz/post/23935860

Google warns “passwords are not only painful to maintain, but are also more prone to phishing and often leaked through data breaches.” And that’s the real issue. “It’s important to use tools that automatically secure your account and protect you from scams,” Google tells users, and that means upgrading account security now.

Google says “we want to move beyond passwords altogether, while keeping sign-ins as easy as possible.” That includes social sign ins, but mainly it means passkeys. “Passkeys are phishing-resistant and can log you in simply with the method you use to unlock your device (like your fingerprint or face ID) — no password required.”

This is just one of their excuses, to keep their users inside google’s walled-garden

  • AE5NE@lemmy.radio
    41·
    10 days ago

    passkeys are way for your a token unlocked by your device’s biometric sensor to validate a request. biometric information is not sent to Google

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        1·
        9 days ago

        In this case, it’s pretty true. You can view the webauthn protocol, the FIDO2 documentation, etc, that are the foundation of what we know as “passkey” technology.

        It’s all cryptographic hashes getting sent around, essentially. The more high-grade security implementations are “device-bound passkeys” which do require a minimal amount of hardware registration, though, but you shouldn’t ever need to do that unless you’re like… accessing sensitive datasets or secure services, at which point you’re most likely registering a work device, anyhow.