• cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    If we’re being pedantic (and why not!) then the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is actually only 103 years old.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If we’re being fair, a government running without revolution for 250 years is pretty old. Many of the oldest establishments in the US are likely to stand after a revolution or civil war, much like pubs and restaurants in Europe.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    How does this guy know enough history to know the age of the US, but not that other countries were around before it? At the very least you’d think he knows it started as a colony.

    • sleep_deprived@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s been some planning and minor media to-do about the 250th anniversary. For example, IIRC there’s a picture of Kid Rock in an incredibly gaudy suit with “250” written on it, taken in the oval office next to Trump.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      8 days ago

      Even if you consider each Chinese dynasty to be a distinct nation (I wouldn’t, but even if you did) there are several dynasties that lasted well over 250 years.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m curious why you wouldn’t consider many of the Chinese dynasties their own countries, in a way?

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          The culture and history are largely consistent, including after Confucius the bureaucratic structure, which survived through many dynasties until Mao, and even the communist revolution didn’t completely wipe the influence of Confucius.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I feel like similar things could be said of many places in the world, but surely you wouldn’t consider, say, the country of India to stretch as far back? Or Italy? Turkey?

            Even sticking with China, surely the mongol led Yuan dynasty is worth separating from before and after it, if you’re considering modern borders. Like, does Mongolia get the same claim as China does in that case for oldest country? It kinda becomes a fuzzy question to me. There’s got to be a better academically defined way.

            • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              India probably, yeah. Italy as a national identity didn’t exist until 1861, and Germany until 1871, and there are still regions in both countries with strong identities like Bavaria. Culture outlasts constitutions.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s an argument to be made that a new system of government makes it a new country. Like, the absolutist monarchy of France isn’t the same country as the republic of France. Especially if the borders change, too. Detto for China and Japan. But even conceding that, OOP is full of shit.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Detto

        It’s dito in English and as far as I know mostly in German too. Aber vielleicht macht ihr das in Österreich anders, näher am Italienischen? Hier in der Schweiz habe ich detto noch nicht angetroffen.

        • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Meine Familie ist halb Süd- halb Nordtirol, also liegt die Nähe zum Italienischen nahe. Bzw vielleicht sogar zum Ladinischen (ähnlich Romansch), das sprechen meine Verwandten noch eher als Italienisch. So wie ichs gewohnt bin heisst Dito ‘mir geht es gleich wie dir’ und detto ‘das ist gleich wie beim anderen’, also ein leichter Bedeutungsunterschied. Ich find Dialekte immer sehr spannend, danke für den Input!

        • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If neither a change in borders nor a change in governance makes a new country, every country is as old as the earth. Anarchy is a mode of governance, too, even though it’s a lack thereof.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 days ago

      See, now that is where one gets nitpicky about the idea of “nation” and this gets performatively nerdy.

      • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        That was my first reaction: what do we mean by a “nation?” Is it performatively nerdy? Haha, I feel authentically nerdy and abuzz with questions!

        We talking about a particular government/regime or just some continuity of format? Which borders, ie which constituent territories? Do ethnic tribes count? Does the pub and it’s chain of ownership and hereditary patronage count?

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The house I grew up in is much older than the USA’s inependance. It’s not the oldest building in town.

    The town’s church is ~300 years older than Christopher Collumbus’ arrival in the Americas. If it didn’t burn twice, and didn’t had to be rebuilt twice, if would have been a few 100s of years older.

    There are countless towns and cities with buildings older than the USA at every street corner here. That person obviously never been to Europe.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      yeah the town i grew up in celebrated its 750th recently. it’s not even close.

    • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      In Japanese tradition, you count the age of the building’s soul. Even if it burns down and you rebuild it, the age of the building doesn’t reset to 0.

      I don’t have any references for this, just my experience.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        i’d say this sorta applies in the rest of the world, if it’s rebuilt in the right way people will go “it’s 1200 years old but it got bombed to shit and rebuilt after WW2”

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just because the alignment of nation and state into nation state happened to innovate around the late 18th century, like the US independence, does not mean that the US is the only nation (state) from that era.

    There is not much information density in the idea that “no nation existed for longer than 250 years” when the very idea of nation state is as old itself and nations (or nationes) and states existed for much, much longer than that.