Let’s have a lunch and learn!

  • yool_ooloo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    ‘contextual knowledge’

    this gem was put forward in all seriousness when the data didn’t support the claims in the report: “it’s not in the numbers, but we have a pretty good sense that this is true”

  • Twig@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    The term “let’s slow time this” was used for a while. I can only assume that was some corporate phrase.

  • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The Q3 numbers have a life of their own. Growing, shrinking, zig zagging all over the place. Pushing needles, pulling levers. And fyi, the roi is tbd. high five synergy!

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I heard “rightsizing” for the first time last year.

    I have no idea what knucklehead PR dumbass came up with that but it made the following layoffs even more unpalatable.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The only time I hear rightsizing is for cloud resources. I’ve never heard of it in human resources. That sucks.

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Alright, team, let’s circle back and ensure we’re fully aligned on our north star objectives. We need to leverage synergy, engage in blue-sky thinking, and touch base on our pain points to drive mission-critical outcomes. But let’s not boil the ocean with unnecessary jargon - at the end of the day, we need to optimize our bandwidth for real, value-driven impact. If we keep moving the needle with this kind of thought leadership theater, we risk losing sight of our core competencies and drowning in a sea of meaningless buzzwords. Let’s pivot toward clear, actionable insights and sunset the overuse of strategic messaging before it becomes a blocker to true innovation. Instead of just playing the fast-follow game with every trending framework, let’s focus on original, high-impact execution that actually drives results.

    Thoughts? Chris, do you have any builds?

    No?

    Good. Then let’s action this and drive it across the finish line!

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      There was a website at some point that would put up themed meeting phrases each week, with points if anyone used them and caught it. I still remember a few of them.

      “I don’t want a pot of gold at the end of this rainbow, I expect a pot of uranium.”

      “We either play barbie or go home. I didn’t get come here today to be Skipper.”

      “I don’t say we build a barbie dream house, I want use to build a barbie on ecstasy house.”

      “Is this a queen alien problem? Or more of a face hugger we can ignore for a while?”

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Perfect except for ‘Thoughts?’ Instead of that it should be an appeal to the speaker’s boss: ‘Chris, do you have any builds?’

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Good catch!”

    Usually said when you bring up something that needs fixing, and said as a way to puff you up and not actually follow up on the problem.