• sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looks like the judge is reversing it based on nothing but carbrain, calling the bike lane “arbitrary” and “capricious”. Looks like this whole court is out of order.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The key words I pick out are “in violation of lawful procedure”. I don’t like this choice either, but it looks like the city took a shortcut

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Ah I didn’t see that part, thank you.

        Yeah the judge doesn’t sound so wrong any more.

        I guess it depends on if DOT actually violated the law or the judge is ruling on a stretch. I wish had more details.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          No kidding. All too often even clear looking articles seem to have important details missing

    • watson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m pretty sure there’s gonna be an appeal. The judge gave 30 days before the order must be executed. He also denied all of the other claims.

      This is not a ruling that should be difficult to get reversed on appeal